<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Continuations - Latest Comments in A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://continuations.disqus.com/a_mind_bender_worth_testing/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:05:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20155518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure that your logic aligns with what the scientists are claiming. They believe that any attempt that would  isolate the Higgs boson is stopped. So this doesn't have to be our only attempt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A similar attempt was made in the early 1990s in the US that also failed. It seems that the future intervenes whenever we build something that would put us in jeopardy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:05:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20155113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with the argument is that the LHC must be guaranteed to isolate the Higgs boson, and that it will be mankind's only attempt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's a pretty big assumption. Only in this case would the future be justified in intervening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't really believe I just wrote that - I think we've arrived at the requisite level of craziness to consider all of this plausible!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Semeria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:59:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20148665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree completely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20142615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So wild. I'm with you that the LHC is a sucker's bet, too, though a fascinating one.  I'd place a utility value of the end of the world at somewhere approaching negative infinity; in that case, no matter how small the odds of the LHC causing the destruction of earth and life as we know it, the expected value of the experiment is still...abysmal. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LukeG</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:53:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20142421</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point -- I left off the best part.  Although in this particular case it might just be crazy enough!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:50:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20137782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article - thanks for the link (and the links from there).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20137280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed...it's a win-win for the world no matter what. Let's hope the future is strong enough to protect us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:55:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20136851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A risk that I would happily be willing to take!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:49:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20131885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See here: &lt;a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/10/14/spooky-signals-from-the-future-telling-us-to-cancel-the-lhc/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/10/14/spooky-signals-from-the-future-telling-us-to-cancel-the-lhc/"&gt;http://blogs.discovermagazi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan McKinley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:49:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20131727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well spotted!  Let's hope the future is subtle, but not malicious...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Semeria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20131298</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...unless the "future" is just screwing with us and/or doesn't want us to ever be sure of its role in our present. If that were the case then the 1,000,000,000,000,000 to 1 card test would indeed go with the odds - i.e. the LHC would be allowed to go on. Only after would the "future" step in with a less obvious sabotage and stop it from going live but still leave doubt - e.g. what happened with the magnets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20128903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes - that would be the way to do it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20128547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In theory - the odds could be tremendously stacked in favor of keeping the LHC - 1,000,000,000,000,000 to 1 that it won't be destroyed. It shouldn't matter how low the odds are since if it's meant to be destroyed then it will be destroyed. This was governments' could argue that there is a greater chance of a natural disaster destroying it than the actual experiment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and I agree, it must be 100% guaranteed that the LHC would be scrapped.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20127202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree that it sounds far fetched, but so does much of science -- black holes anyone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:48:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20126466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been following the Large Hadron Collider and heard about this story.  This theory sounds pretty far fetched.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you seen these science videos?  They're great for more info about string theory, planets, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;elegant universe (&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=string%20theory&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;tab=wv#q=elegant+universe&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;emb=0&amp;amp;dur=3&amp;amp;client=firefox-a)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=string%20theory&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;tab=wv#q=elegant+universe&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;emb=0&amp;amp;dur=3&amp;amp;client=firefox-a)"&gt;http://video.google.com/vid...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Universe (&lt;a href="http://www.hulu.com/the-universe)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.hulu.com/the-universe)"&gt;http://www.hulu.com/the-uni...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">theschnaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20126283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then again the LHC itself is not an easy thing to explain to tax payers :-)  Arguably this could save a lot of money going forward (never mind the universe).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mind Bender Worth Testing</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/213788090#comment-20125971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Albert!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the stop card experiment to be valid, it must be 100% guaranteed that the LHC would be scrapped if the stop card came up. Not an easy thing to explain to tax payers...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Semeria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>