http://continuations.disqus.com/enSat, 07 Nov 2009 00:15:05 -0000http://continuations.com/post/235068608#comment-22083071<p>Thanks, although that may be stretching it a bit! Bijan had a related post today also and apparently Brad Feld did a couple of days ago (but I somehow missed that). Will try to pull them all together at some point.</p>albertSat, 07 Nov 2009 00:15:05 -0000http://continuations.com/post/235068608#comment-22082999<p>i love these posts you and fred did today. quite possibly the greatest single day of blogging in USV history. congrats on the milestone, albert!</p>kidmercurySat, 07 Nov 2009 00:12:01 -0000http://continuations.com/post/235068608#comment-22062520<p>We always look at everything on a fully diluted basis. I think if you present a deal to existing or potential investors you should do the same. It's not a good way to start off a relationship or to treat existing investors to have them surprised about the full impact of a deal.</p>albertFri, 06 Nov 2009 16:19:37 -0000http://continuations.com/post/235068608#comment-22061431<p>When talking to potential investors, should you focus on full-diluted (effective) valuation or the pre-conversion?<br>I find that many investors use warrants to sweeten their deal and then previous investors get flustered because of the different scenarios as they don't understand their dilution because the simple math doesn't work out.</p>Larry MFri, 06 Nov 2009 15:52:43 -0000